Market leading development
programmes created by IFAs for IFAs

Request Callback

First Name
Surname
Telephone
 
Close Window

Journal :: £150,000 Income Pension Trap

Graham DragonPublished: November 10, 2009
Author: Graham Dragon
Category: Tax
Permalink: £150,000 Income Pension Trap

Do you have clients who may trigger the tax penalties for high earners who wish to make pension contributions?

The “Anti-Forestalling Rules??? are complex. They were originally laid out in a 52 page document on the HMRC site. This document is still there, but is now out of date due to changes enacted when the legislation passed through Parliament. For the most up to date information you should consult section 15 of the Registered Pension Schemes Manual.

I sent out an e-mail about this subject earlier in the year, but make no apology for sending this update on such an important topic.

In a nutshell, if your client will have taxable income this tax year of £150,000 or more, or had such an income in either of the two previous tax years, the anti-forestalling rules will apply. These rules can penalise a client for putting more money into his or her pension, and can even penalise a client for transferring a pension (depending on how contributions to that pension have been made).

If you have a client with income close to £150,000, is there any way that client can avoid the tax penalties whilst at the same time taking benefits from their company that mean “income??? effectively exceeds this limit?

Many accountants seem to be advising their clients that there is no way of doing this. Certainly the Revenue have tried to close the immediately obvious loopholes.

One way is simply to take some of the benefits as an additional pension contribution. If the Revenue can argue there has been a salary sacrifice to achieve this the anti-forestalling rules will apply. However, if your client’s income has not reached £150,000 in previous years and the previous salary and bonus level has simply been maintained, then it is difficult to see how the Revenue could claim there has been a sacrifice this year. Watch out for any contractual agreements which could shoot your client in the foot, though. For example, if there is a bonus scheme which, if properly applied, would mean the £150,000 threshold were reached, then clearly there has been a salary sacrifice if your client takes a bonus just below this and then takes the rest as pension.

Another solution may be to take a salary sacrifice but then use it for something other than a pension. For example a company car, or even an interest-free loan. As long as the amount sacrificed is diverted in this way, and this keeps the client’s total taxable income below £150,000, the company may then make a large pension contribution on the client’s behalf and there will be no tax penalties arising from the anti-forestalling rules. This is because the salary sacrifice element of the rules specifically refers to salary sacrifice diverted into pension contributions rather than into any other benefit. The benefit obtained will itself, of course, be taxable, but the taxable value for the benefit-in-kind charge may be less than the real value to the client. For example, the interest free loan could give the client a substantial sum, which could then be repaid in a later year when the £150,000 threshold is no longer an issue.

As always, keep an open mind and stay creative when reviewing a client’s circumstances. Don’t be blinded by the headlights of Revenue announcements or accountants’ pessimistic pronouncements. There is often a way of achieving what the client wants to achieve if we only look carefully.

I hope you found this edition of our IFA Journal helpful. Keep an eye on your inbox for other tips and useful information.

Found this article helpful?

Why not sign up for our Journal to have articles like these emailed to you regularly so you can stay ahead of the game. Alternatively, continue reading our Journal Archive.

About Graham Dragon

Graham Dragon

Graham is a Technical Consultant. He specialises in tax planning as well as dealing with other technical matters behind the scene. He is a qualified Taxation Technician as well as having written a number of books on this subject. Graham has a sciences honours degree and the Financial Planning Certificate. He joined Cadde in 1993 after a long international career in General and Financial Management.

Read more of Graham's articles.

Note: We do not accept liability for the content of our e-mail Journal or for the consequences of any actions taken or not taken by yourself or any third party on the basis of the information provided. We are unable to advise you on tax matters. If you wish to obtain further information or help on this or on any other tax matters you should consult with a tax accountant or other suitably qualified and experienced tax professional.

Share This Article

Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Share to Digg Share to StumbleUpon Share to LinkedIn

About the Adviser Breakthrough Journal

Adviser Breakthrough Solutions provides the IFA community with a FREE and easy way to keep ahead of the game. Subscription to this journal is FREE. To sign up simply enter your name and email address below.

View Journal Archive

Journal Categories

Back Office (10) Maximise Description

Client Care (7) Maximise Description

Marketing (16) Maximise Description

Money Making (6) Maximise Description

Motivational (3) Maximise Description

Tax (76) Maximise Description

Time Management (3) Maximise Description